Total Pageviews

Monday, September 8, 2014

The true identity of Shakyamuni Buddha and Nichiren Daishonin

The Daishonin is Bodhisattva Jogyo, disciple of the Eternal Original Buddha Shakyamuni.

"Since the Buddha of the Juryo chapter is revealed as the eternal Buddha, it follows that the great Bodhisattvas such as Monju and Miroku, and the great bodhisattvas from other realms are in fact disciples of Shakyamuni Buddha.  If, among all the numerous sutras, this Juryo chapter should be lacking, it would be as though there were no sun and moon in the sky, no  supreme ruler in thenation, no gems in the mountains and rivers, and no  spirit in man. "(MW, V2, pg. 150)

"Since Sakyamuni Buddha is eternal and all other Buddhas in the universe are His manifestations, then those great bodhisattvas converted by manifested Buddhas are also disciples of Lord Sakyamuni Buddha.  If the "Life Span of the Buddha" chapter had not been expounded, it would be like the sky without the sun and moon, a country without a king, mountains and  rivers without gems, or a man without a soul." (Noppa, pg. 176, Kaimoku Sho)

"Thus it was revealed that Shakyamuni had long been the Buddha since the eternal past, and it became clear that various Buddhas in other worlds were all manifestations of Shakyamuni Buddha..[ ] now, however, as Shakyamuni was proved to be the Eternal Buddha, those Buddhas in the Flower Garland Sutra, or Buddhas in the Hodo, Hannya, or Great Sun Buddha sutras all became  subordinates of Shakyamuni Buddha."  (Kaimoku Sho, p. 174, translated by  Kyotsu Hori, 1987)

BTW, here's the same quote, as translated by NSIC.  Please note the differences:

"When Shakyamuni Buddha revealed that he had gained enlightenment in the far distant past and had since then been constantly in the world, it became apparent that all the other Buddhas were emanations of Shakyamuni....but now it becomes apparent that Vairocana Buddha of the Kegon Sutra and various Buddhas of the Hodo, Hannya and Dainichi sutras are in fact all followers of Shakyamuni Buddha."  (MW V.2, p.149)

"Since Shakyamuni Buddha is eternal and all other Buddhas in the universe are His manifestations........" (Kaimoku Sho, translated by Kyotsu Hori, p.176).

"But now that it has become apparent that Shakyamuni Buddha attained enlightenment countless aeons ago,.......etc.   (MW V.2, p. 151)

Not only is there no mention of Nichiren as "True" Buddha in the Kaimoku Sho but in the Kanjin Honzon Sho, translated by Kyotsu Hori, nowhere, does Nichiren mention that he is the "True" Buddha:

"...Shakyamuni Buddha, within our minds, is an ancient Buddha without beginning, manifesting Himself in three bodies, he attained Buddhahood in the eternal past......(ibid.  P.94)

"Shakyamuni Buddha, the Lord-preacher of this pure land, has never died in the past, nor will he be born in the future.  He exists forever, throughout the past, present and future."  (P.100)

"Many wooden statues and portraits were made of Shakyamuni Buddha as He preached Hinayana and quasi-Mahayana sutras, but statues and portraits of the Eternal Shakyamuni Buddha revealed in the Juryo Chapter of the Lotus Sutra were never made.  Now, in the beginning of Mappo, is it not the time that such statues and portraits are made?"  (P.104)

The Hoon Sho (translated by Taikyo Yajima) states:

"All the people in Japan as well as the rest of the whole world should revere  Lord Buddha Shakyamuni revealed in the essential section (honmon) of the  Lotus Sutra as the object of worship (honzon)."   (P. 198)
            
The Lotus Sutra itself states:

 "For the sake of curing his children gone mad,
Though in reality he exists, yet he says he dies,
And there are none who can declare it is a vain lie;
I likewise am the Father of the World,
The One who saves from the various sufferings and travails.
Because the unenlightened worldlings are wrongheaded,
Though in reality I exist, I say I am extinguished;
because by seeing me constantly,
They would produce an arrogant and licentious mind,
Self abandoned, attached to the five desires,
And would fall among the Evil ways of rebirth.
I ever know the masses of beings,
Proceeding or not proceeeding on the Way;
According to what will save them,
I preach for them all sorts of Dharmas.
I Myself ever form this thought:
'By what shall I cause the masses of beings
To be able to enter the supreme Way
And rapidly achieve Buddhahood."(Lotus Sutra, Chapter 16)
               
Now we can begin to examine how Nichiren viewed himself.

"...the Bodhisattvas (who sprang from underneath the ground), as described in the 15th chapter, are followers of the Original Buddha Shakaymuni who resides within our minds."(p.94)

" The object of veneration (Honzon) at the scene of this transmission of Namu Myoho Renge Kyo from the Eternal Buddha to his original disciples is suspended in the sky above the Eternal Buddha Sakyamuni's Saha-world. 

The Lotus Sutra, Chapter 16 states, "Then he sent a messenger back to his children, telling them that their father has passed away." In the Kanjin Honzon Sho, Nichiren explains the phrase: ''send a messenger back",  as those bodhisattvas who were called out from underground.
           
The SGI and Nichiren Shoshu argue that  Nichiren Daishonin states in the Opening of the Eyes that, "I will be the Pillar of Japan; I will be the Eyes of Japan; I will be the Great Vessel of Japan, proving  that Nichiren possesses the Three Virtues of the Original Buddha. But this is a mistake for the following reasons:

1). It can be contrasted to the following passage in the Kaimoku Sho where Nichiren states that Shakyamuni possesses the Three Virtues for "all beings" : "One should know that the Enlightened One, the Buddha, is a Great Teacher for all living beings, a Great Eye for them, a Great Pillar, a Great Helmsman, a Great Field of Plenty." (MW vol 2, Opening of the Eyes, pg 77)
2). The above passage of the Lotus Sutra states: "I am the Father of the world", not just the little island nation of Japan.
3). Nichiren in many other Gosho besides the Kaimoku Sho explains that Shakyamuni is the parent,  teacher and sovereign of the entire world (Admonitions Against Slander, Letter to Nikke, Letter to Nichimyo Shonin, The Learned Doctor Shan-wu-wei, Letter to Myomitsu Shonin, Rebuking Slander of the Law, Letter to Ichinosawa Nyudo, On Prayer and others).
          
Now we can move on to some of the passages in both the Lotus Sutra and the writings of Nichiren revealing the Daishonin's true identity:
        
"I Nichiren, humble person though I am, have received Lord Shakyamuni's  royal command and come to this country of Japan." (MW vol 5, The Pure and  Far Reaching Voice, pg 143)

The Original Eternal Buddha has never received the royal command of anyone, he invokes them.

"Will the Bodhsattva Visista-caritra (Jogyo) appear in these days of the Latter Law to open wide the gateway of the Truth, or will he not appear? The Scripture tells us so; yet will it surely happen?  Will the Bodhisattva appear or not?  At any rate, I, Nichiren have now accomplished the pioneerwork." (Selection of the Time).

"For one aeon, two aeons, countless aeons I devoted myself to the practices of a bodhisattva, until I had almost reached the state where I couldn't never fail to attain Buddhahood.  And yet I was dragged down by the powerful and overwhelming influence of evil, and I never attained Buddhahood. I do not know whether I belong to the third group of those who heard the preaching of the sons of Daitsu Buddha and yet failed to  attain enlightenment even when one son was reborn in the world as Shakyamuni Buddha, or whether I faltered and fell away from the teachings which I heard long before Daitsu Buddha, at gohyaku jintengo and thus have been reborn in this form. (MW,V2, pg.112)

Moreover, I am a poor monk without social status. While having traversed the Six Realms in my past lives, I have sometimes been born a great king in the human or celestial realm, making everyone obey me just as a strong wind sways the twigs of small trees. Still, I could not attain Buddhahood then. At other times, I must have gone up step by step the way a great bodhisattva according to Hinayana and Mahayana sutras.  Having practiced the way of a bodhisattva for as long as one, two and in numerous kalpa, I was about to reach the state of non-retrogression.  However, a powerful, evil karma prevented me from obtaining Buddhahood.

According to the "Parable of a Magic City" chapter of the Lotus Sutra there were three categories of people who had an opportunity to listen to the sutra and sow the seed of Buddhahood during the time of Daitsuchisho Buddha in the past. They were all to attain Buddhahood eventually with the third and last group being guaranteed of being future Buddhas upon listening to Shakyamuni Buddha preach the Lotus Sutra. I wonder whether or not I was excluded from this third category of people. Or, am I one of those who, while having listened to the Lotus Sutra and sowed the seed of Buddhahood 500 dust-particle kalpa (gohyaku-jindengo) in the past, have kept falling back till today without eventually getting it? .. (Noppa, Kaimoku Sho, page 92-94)

"I Nichiren, received the Buddha's edict and was born in this land . ." (On Practicing According to the Preaching" (Nyosetsu shugyo sho STN, v. 1, 733 1, 2), 
         
From Lotus Sutra Chapter 21:

Because, after the Buddha's extinction,
It is possible to possess this sutra,
The buddhas all rejoice
And show infinite powers divine.
Now that this sutra is entailed
To him who keeps it, let praise,
Through kalpas infinite,
Be inexhaustible.
The merits of this man
Shall be boundless and without end
As space in every direction,
Which cannot find a limit.
He who can keep this sutra
Is one who already beholds me
And also the Buddha Abundant Treasures,
And all buddhas emanated [from me],
And sees besides the bodhisattvas
Whom I have instructed until now.
He who can keep this sutra
Will cause me and the [buddhas] emanated from me,
And the Buddha Abundant Treasures in nirvana,
All of us entirely to rejoice;
And the buddhas now in the universe,
And those of the past and the future,
He shall also see and serve
And cause to rejoice.
The mysterious laws that have been attained
By the buddhas each on his wisdom throne,
He who can keep this sutra
Must surely gain ere long.
He who can keep this sutra
Shall the meaning of the laws,
With their terms and expressions,
Delightedly expound without end,
Like the wind in the sky,
Which never has impediment.
After the Tathagata is extinct [such a one],
Knowing [this] sutra that the Buddha has taught,
[Together with] its reasoning and process,
Shall expound it according to its true meaning.
Just as the light of the sun and moon
Can dispel the darkness,
So this man, working in the world,
Can disperse the gloom of the living
And cause numberless bodhisattvas
Finally to abide in the One-vehicle.
Therefore he who has wisdom,
Hearing the benefits of this merit,
After I am extinct,
Should receive and keep this sutra.
This man shall in the Way of the Buddha
Be fixed and have no doubts."
The Daishonin says:

" I Nichiren may be a fool, but, having declared myself to be the messenger of Shakyamuni Buddha and the Votary of the Lotus  Sutra, it isnothing short  of amazing that my words unheeded"-- Letter To Ichinosawa Nyudo,

"Until the envoy of the Buddha actually appeared to expound the  LotusSutra...  However, now that I am spreading the Lotus Sutra  as the Buddha'senvoy , everyone -- from ruler to the lowliest subject--  has become a slanderer."---Letter to Niike).

and

I, Nichiren, may not be an envoy sent by the Buddha,  but my appearance in this world coincides with the age of the Latter Day. Moreover, quite unexpectedly, I came  to realize this teaching, which I now expound to prepare the way for a sage. (Letter to Misawa)

Graham Lamont writes:

In 1277 (the third year of the Kenji era) Nichiren Daishonin wrote a deposition on behalf of Shijo Kingo Yorimoto (the autograph no longer exists but TWO versions copied by Nikko still exist at the Omosu Hommonji (STN v.2, 1346, 1360 notes):

1)  an unrevised version compiled in 1278 (the first year of Koan) with the title "On the Dialogue with Ryuzo" or RYUZO MONDO SHO.
2)  a "revised version" from the fifth year of Showa (1316) when Nikko was seventy-one years old.  Since Nikko's colophon says that he copied this from a "revised version" (saiji hon) it is probable that Nichiren Daishonin rewrote some of the passages some time after 1278.
       
It is instructive that Nikko would copy this later in his life as a message to his disciples that the revised version is definitive.
        
Let's look at the correct faith for a disciple of Nichiren:

"I believe it is preached in the HOKEKYO that His Reverence Nichiren Daishonin is the BODHISATTVA JOGYO, the messenger the Tathagata Shakya, Lord of the Three Worlds, Father and Mother of All Beings.“ (STN v.2 1358 and note 1).  The capitalized part, the words THE BODHISATTVA JOGYO are in the revised edition.
             
Nichiren Daishonin himself went to the trouble of adding thewords "the Bodhisattva Jogyo" and even if Nikko,  after the death of Nichiren,  added those words, here and in the other revised sections, it shows that Nikko regarded Nichiren Daishonin as the bodhisattva Jogyo.

This is proof of how Nichiren Daishonin or, at the very least Nikko, saw the Daishonin's true identity.  This identity, which he sometimes hid, was that of the Bodhisattva Jogyo not of the Buddha.
         
Further evidence is found in the Gosho, The Plots of  the elder of Gokurakuji,", the account of the plot of Ryokanbo Nisho, against Nichiren Daishonin.  The unrevised account refers to the attempt to kill Nichiren and to the obstacles to him and his disciples on Sado but says nothing about Nichiren Daishonin identity. However, in the REVISED EDITION of Nikko,  though not in Nichiren's hand, it states:

 "Nichiren Daishonin, if it is as it is preached in the Sutra, is the Sage who is the Messenger of the Tathagata Who Attained in the Distant Past (kujo nyorai no onzukai), the Descent (suijaku) of the Bodhisattva Jogyo, the Practicer (gyoja) of the Original Doctrine (or Aspect - Hommon) of the Hokke, the Great Guiding Teacher of the fifth five hundred years" (STN v.2, 1352)

Why would Nichiren or Nikko include these words which clearly illustrate that Nichiren Daishonin is the emissary from the Eternal Buddha and the manifestation of Bodhisattva Jogyo, unless they were attempting to show that he actually  is the Bodhisattva Jogyo sent by the Buddha Shakyamuni?

In the Minobu period letters, nowhere did Nichiren Daishonin feel himself to be the Buddha, although he is certain of his attainment of Buddhahood. Rather, as he had said in the treatise "On Practicing According to the Preaching" (Nyosetsu shugyo sho STN, v. 1, 733 1, 2), "I Nichiren, received the Buddha’s Proclamation and was born in this land."  He also says he has engaged in his crusade of shakubuku "because theDecree of the Dharma King is difficult to defy." (ibid) 

(Note that this Nyosetsu Shugyo Sho survives only in the manuscript of Nikko's disciple Tayu Nichizon (1265-1345), copied in 1297 (the fifth year of Einin).)
          
Now we can look at what Nikko's has to say:

"The Order of Spreading the Sutra in the Three Ages (Sanji gukyo shidai)(Nichirenshu shugku zensho, II, 53) specifically says:

"The Temple of the Hommon
 The disciple of Entrustment
 The Bodhisattva Jogyo Nichiren Daishonin."

It is clear that in the Original Doctrine (Hommon), the correct doctrine Nichiren Daishonin is considered the Manifestation of Jogyo, the Great Bodhisattva Converted by the Original Buddha, the disciple clearly delegated with the substance of the Sutra in the "Chapter of the Divine Powers of the Tathagatas" 21.  This same work of Nikko refers to the Buddha Shakya Who Attained in the Past (Kujo no Shaka Butsu) the Supreme Enlightenment  as the Object of Worship.
          
There is also proof to be found on a particular Gohonzon from 1274 (currently kept at Myohonji at Hota.)  It is No. 16 in the Catalogue of the Gohonzon Collection (Yamanaka Kihachi, Nichiren Daishonin Shinseki no Sekai, p 323 and type B (II) 7 no. 13 in Nichiren Daishonin Mandara zushu, pp. 58-59) On it, in what is considered a "lauditary text", Nichiren writes:

"Since the entrance into Extinction of the Great Enlightened World Honored One there have passed in succession more than two thousand two hundred  and twenty years. Even so among the Three Countries of India, Han (China) and Japan, there has not yet been this GREAT OBJECT OF WORSHIP (Dai Honzon). Either they have known but not yet spread it or they have not known it. Our Compassionate Father, by means of the Buddha Wisdom, has hidden and retained it, leaving it for the Latter Age.  At the time of the last five hundred  years, the Bodhisattva Jogyo comes forth in the world and for the first time  spreads and proclaims it."

Here we have clear proof that Shakyamuni is the Father of all people of the world and Nichiren is the messenger.
             

34 comments:

  1. The eternal Buddha Shakyamuni seems like the manifestation of our eternal Buddha nature and Nichiren Daishonin the finger pointing the way

    ReplyDelete
  2. Certainly not merely "nature". The reality of the Three Bodies obviates that. A being like you and I

    ReplyDelete
  3. All the different worlds have the 3 body's they make the Law of the 3 truths. Ku,Ke, and Chu activate the 3 bodies. Because of the mutual possession of the 10 worlds, all nature possesses 3 Bodies.

    Because the nature of the oneness of Delusion and enlightenment, good and evil, everything in existence possesses the 3 bodies of the 3 truths

    The provisional sutras say that the tranquil mind is like the moon and a pure heart is like a flower, but the Lotus Sutra says that the flower and the moon are themselves heart and mind

    ReplyDelete
  4. “…Shakyamuni Buddha, within our minds, is an ancient Buddha without beginning, manifesting Himself in three bodies who attained Buddhahood in the eternal past..." (Kanjin Honzon Sho)

    Of all the Three Thousand Worlds present in a momentary existence of life, Nichiren only gives a personal name to one world, the World of Buddha ["Shakyamuni Buddha"]. Therefore, SGI's assertion that the Eternal Buddha is merely Buddha-nature, is untenable. Shakyamuni Buddha within our lives is the totality of Ichinen Sanzen. He is another name for Gohonzon.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "All the different worlds have the 3 body's they make the Law of the 3 truths. Ku,Ke, and Chu activate the 3 bodies. Because of the mutual possession of the 10 worlds, all nature possesses 3 Bodies.

    Because the nature of the oneness of Delusion and enlightenment, good and evil, everything in existence possesses the 3 bodies of the 3 truths"

    Could you please cite your references for these opinions? This is NOT the teaching of Nichiren or the Lotus Sutra. this sounds like some kind of mix between nst and sgi "doctrine".
    gassho

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The 3 Bodies, 3 truths, Nyo ze so, Nyo ze sho, Nyo ze tai of the 10 factors are the same principle. The mutual possession of the10 worlds are part of ichinen sanzen which incorporates all.
      As far as I know these metaphysical Buddhist concepts were formulated by Tendai who is like a foundation stone of Nichiren Buddhism that supports and all of the NichirenBuddhist sects

      Nichiren talks about the true entity of phenomena as having a defiled and pure aspect and that life is the oneness of good and evil

      Delete
  6. Actually, Nichiren teaches that Tientai's teachings in Mappo are as useless as last years calender. He also teaches:

    "Speaking in stricter terms, however, one would have to say that Great Concentration and Insight represents a part of the provisional Mahayana teachings set forth in the sutras preached prior to the Lotus, that is, a part of the specific teaching."

    The meditation and purpose of Great Concentration and Insight was to observe the mind and find within the 3000 Realms [Theoretical Ichinen Sanzen]. There is no need today. We have the Gohonzon or Actual Ichinen Sanzen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Buddhist cosmological metaphysics are aspects of the infinite potential of the Law of Nmrk

      7 The Chinese Buddhist Schools: Tiantai

      Though considered its third patriarch, the intellectual founder of the Tiantai school was Zhiyi (538–97). Responding to the proliferation of different Buddhist theories and practices, he proposed a masterly, detailed synthesis that definitively set Chinese Buddhism in its own direction. To the question of why there was an abundance of incommensurate teachings despite the fact that there could only be one dharma, Zhiyi replied that all the different vehicles of Buddhism were ultimately one vehicle (eka-yāna), an idea championed by the Lotus Sutra. More specifically, he offered a panjiao, or classificatory scheme of teachings, to explain the discrepancies. His panjiao was complex and brilliant (and further refined much later by Chegwan, a Korean Tiantai monk in China), but in simple form it can be summarized as follows.

      Buddha offered different teachings to different audiences based on the differing capacities of audiences to comprehend what he preached. According to the basic narrative, which became the way all Chinese Buddhists thought of Buddha’s teaching career, upon reaching enlightenment under the Bodhi Tree, Buddha, enraptured by his new vision, began to describe that vision in immediate and exuberant terms. This became the Huayan Sutra. (In reality, this ‘sutra’ is a collection of disparate texts – none probably composed earlier than the third century ad – that were gradually compiled together over several more centuries.) When he finished (it took two or three weeks) he realized that no one had understood the sublime meaning of his words, and immediately began to teach a simplified, preparatory teaching which became the Hīnayāna teachings. After twenty years of preparatory teachings, he introduced the next level, beginners’ Mahāyāna (basically Yogācāra and Madhyamaka). In the next period he introduced advanced Mahāyāna (the Vaipūlya Sutras), and finally in his last days, having now trained many advanced students, he preached the Lotus Sutra and the Nirvāṇa Sutra. In effect this panjiao asserts that the two highest sutras offered by Buddha were the Huayan and Lotus; but whereas the Huayan was too sublime to be understood by any save the most advanced or enlightened students, the Lotus represented Buddha’s most comprehensive, cumulative, mature and accessible teaching, every bit as sublime as the Huayan, but now presented in a pedagogically effective manner. For that reason, Zhiyi made the Lotus Sutra the foundational text of Tiantai. As for the remaining teachings, as the Lotus itself explains, different ‘truths’ can be superseded once they have served their task of raising one to a higher level where a different ‘truth’ holds sway. Buddhism, according to the Lotus and Tiantai, is a system of expedient means (upāya) leading one with partial truths to ever greater, more comprehensive truths. Tiantai teachings are ‘Round Teachings’, meaning that they encircle or encompass everything and, lacking sharp edges, are therefore Perfect. Other forms of Buddhism are not ‘wrong’, but are only partial visions of the One Vehicle that Tiantai most perfectly and completely embodies.

      Delete
  7. Zhiyi, based on an exhaustive exposition of a verse from Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka-kārikās (24: 18), devised a theory of three truths: provisional, empty and middle. The first two are mirror images of each other, two ways of speaking about causes and conditions. A table can provisionally be called a table, since its perceptible form has arisen through causes and conditions, and it only exists provisionally on the basis of those temporary conditions. The table is empty because, being the product of causes and conditions, it lacks its own intrinsic, independent nature. It is ‘middle’ because neither the provisional nor the empty truth about the table fully captures its reality. It is both provisional and empty, and simultaneously neither provisional nor empty. As Zhiyi put it, ‘wondrous being is identical to true emptiness’. Zhiyi sought many ways to express the nondual middle truth. For instance, rejecting the obvious dualism of the distinction most of his contemporaries made between pure mind (xin) and deluded thought-instants (nian), Zhiyi declared that every deluded thought-instant was identical to three thousand chilicosms. The details of the formulas he used to arrive at the number three thousand is less important than fact that it is meant to encompass the full extent of Buddhist cosmological metaphysics. The whole universe in all its dimensions is entailed in every moment of thought. Rather than attempt to eliminate deluded thinking to reach a purified mind, Zhiyi claimed each moment of deluded thinking was already identical to enlightenment. One merely has to see the mind and its operations as they are. This idea was later taken over by the Chan (Zen) school, which expressed it in sayings such as ‘Zen mind is everyday mind’.

    The middle approach is also evident in the Tiantai notion of three gates, or three methods of access to enlightened vision: the Buddha-gate, the gate of sentient beings and the mind-gate. The Buddha-gate was considered too difficult, too abstruse, too remote; one had to be a Buddha already to fully comprehend it. The sentient-being gate (the various methods taught and practised by any sort of being) was also too difficult because there are too many different types of sentient beings all with their own types of delusions, so that this gate is a confusing cacophony of disparate methods, some which may not be appropriate for some beings. The easiest and hence preferable gate was the mind-gate. It is no more remote than this very moment of cognition, its diversity can be observed in every thought-instant, and nothing could ever be more appropriately suited for an individual than to observe one’s own mind. Tiantai cultivated many types of meditation for that purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  8. IF you wish to free yourself from the sufferings of birth and death you have endured since time without beginning and to attain without fail unsurpassed enlightenment in this lifetime, you must perceive the mystic truth that is originally inherent in all living beings. This truth is Myoho-renge-kyo. Chanting Myoho-renge-kyo will therefore enable you to grasp the mystic truth innate in all life.

    The Lotus Sutra is the king of sutras, true and correct in both word and principle. Its words are the ultimate reality, and this reality is the Mystic Law (myōhō). It is called the Mystic Law because it reveals the principle of the mutually inclusive relationship of a single moment of life and all phenomena. That is why this sutra is the wisdom of all Buddhas.

    Life at each moment encompasses the body and mind and the self and environment of all sentient beings in the Ten Worlds as well as all insentient beings in the three thousand realms, including plants, sky, earth, and even the minutest particles of dust. Life at each moment permeates the entire realm of phenomena and is revealed in all phenomena. To be awakened to this principle is itself the mutually inclusive relationship of life at each moment and all phenomena. Nevertheless, even though you chant and believe in Myoho-renge-kyo, if you think the Law is outside yourself, you are embracing not the Mystic Law but an inferior teaching. “Inferior teaching” means those other than this [Lotus] sutra, which are all expedient and provisional. No expedient or provisional teaching leads directly to enlightenment, and without the direct path to enlightenment you cannot attain Buddhahood, even if you practice lifetime after lifetime for countless kalpas. Attaining Buddhahood in this lifetime is then impossible. Therefore, when you chant myōhō and recite renge,1 you must summon up deep faith that Myoho-renge-kyo is your life itself.


    ReplyDelete
  9. You must never think that any of the eighty thousand sacred teachings of Shakyamuni Buddha’s lifetime or any of the Buddhas and bodhisattvas of the ten directions and three existences are outside yourself. Your practice of the Buddhist teachings will not relieve you of the sufferings of birth and death in the least unless you perceive the true nature of your life. If you seek enlightenment outside yourself, then your performing even ten thousand practices and ten thousand good deeds will be in vain. It is like the case of a poor man who spends night and day counting his neighbor’s wealth but gains not even half a coin. That is why the T’ien-t’ai school’s commentary states, “Unless p.4one perceives the nature of one’s life, one cannot eradicate one’s grave offenses.”2 This passage implies that, unless one perceives the nature of one’s life, one’s practice will become an endless, painful austerity. Therefore, such students of Buddhism are condemned as non-Buddhist. Great Concentration and Insight states that, although they study Buddhism, their views are no different from those of non-Buddhists.

    Whether you chant the Buddha’s name,3 recite the sutra, or merely offer flowers and incense, all your virtuous acts will implant benefits and roots of goodness in your life. With this conviction you should strive in faith. The Vimalakīrti Sutra states that, when one seeks the Buddhas’ emancipation in the minds of ordinary beings, one finds that ordinary beings are the entities of enlightenment, and that the sufferings of birth and death are nirvana. It also states that, if the minds of living beings are impure, their land is also impure, but if their minds are pure, so is their land. There are not two lands, pure or impure in themselves. The difference lies solely in the good or evil of our minds.

    It is the same with a Buddha and an ordinary being. When deluded, one is called an ordinary being, but when enlightened, one is called a Buddha. This is similar to a tarnished mirror that will shine like a jewel when polished. A mind now clouded by the illusions of the innate darkness of life is like a tarnished mirror, but when polished, it is sure to become like a clear mirror, reflecting the essential nature of phenomena and the true aspect of reality. Arouse deep faith, and diligently polish your mirror day and night. How should you polish it? Only by chanting Nam-myoho-renge-kyo.

    What then does myō signify? It is simply the mysterious nature of our life from moment to moment, which the mind cannot comprehend or words express. When we look into our own mind at any moment, we perceive neither color nor form to verify that it exists. Yet we still cannot say it does not exist, for many differing thoughts continually occur. The mind cannot be considered either to exist or not to exist. Life is indeed an elusive reality that transcends both the words and concepts of existence and nonexistence. It is neither existence nor nonexistence, yet exhibits the qualities of both. It is the mystic entity of the Middle Way that is the ultimate reality. Myō is the name given to the mystic nature of life, and hō, to its manifestations. Renge, which means lotus flower, is used to symbolize the wonder of this Law. If we understand that our life at this moment is myō, then we will also understand that our life at other moments is the Mystic Law.4 This realization is the mystic kyō, or sutra. The Lotus Sutra is the king of sutras, the direct path to enlightenment, for it explains that the entity of our life, which manifests either good or evil at each moment, is in fact the entity of the Mystic Law.

    If you chant Myoho-renge-kyo with deep faith in this principle, you are certain to attain Buddhahood in this lifetime. That is why the sutra states, “After I have passed into extinction, [one] should accept and uphold this sutra. Such a person assuredly and without doubt will attain the Buddha way.”5 Never doubt in the slightest.

    Respectfully.

    Maintain your faith and attain Buddhahood in this lifetime. Nam-myoho-renge-kyo, Nam-myoho-renge-kyo.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Not sure what your point is Noel but thanks for sharing the teachings of the Masters Tientai and Nichiren.

    ReplyDelete
  11. With respect, I love the articles.
    You mentioned that all the other Buddhas that lived throughout the universe are the manifestation of Shakymuni Buddha.
    How about Amida Buddha?
    I heard that without Amida Buddha transcendent vows, Shakymuni Buddha wouldn't have existed.

    ReplyDelete
  12. If you really study and believe the Lotus Sutra and Nichiren and not the opinions of the Pure Land heretics, you will come to awaken to the truth. I will dig up two articles on the Nembutsu and post them.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Here is one...

    Shinran writes in his most important work Jinenhonisho:

    "When we speak of 'Nature' (Jinen), the character Ji means 'naturally' by itself (Onozukara). It is not (the result of) an intention (self assertion or Hakarai) of the devotee. Nen is a word which means to 'cause to come about' (shikarashimu). Shikarashimu (also signifies that it) is not (due to any) effort (Hakarai) of the devotee. Since it is (the result of) the Vow of the Tathagata, we call it Honi i.e., truth. We say of Honi that it 'causes to come about' because it is the Vow of the Tathagata. Since the truth is the Vow of the Tathagata, we say generally that it is not (the result of) the effort of the devotee, and therefore, the power (virtue) of this Dharma is that it 'causes to be'. For the first time, there is nothing to be done by man. This is what we should understand as 'the reason which is beyond reason' (Mugi-no-Gi). Originally Jinen was a word meaning 'to cause to be.' We say Jinen when the devotee does not consider his goodness or evil, in accordance with the fact that Amida has vowed originally (that salvation was to be attained) not by the efforts of the devotee, but by being embraced and caused to rely on the Namu Amida Butsu (his name). In the Vow which we hear, it is vowed that he will cause us (to attain) the highest Buddhahood. 'Highest Buddhahood' signifies to abide in formlessness. Because we are without form, we say Jinen (Nature). When we indicate that there is a form, we do not speak of the highest Nirvana. We heard and learned for the first time that the one who makes known formlessness is called Amida. Amida is the means by which we are caused to know formlessness. After we understand this principle, we should not constantly discuss Jinen (Nature). If we constantly discuss it, the principle that 'what is beyond reason is reason' is made (to conform to) reason. This is the mystery of Buddha-wisdom."

    Buddhahhod without any effort of the devotee? It comes about because of the vow of the Buddha Amida? This Dharma "Causes to be"? "Highest Buddhahood is to abide in formlessness"? "When we indicate form we do not speak of the highest Nirvana"?

    But Rick, a believer in Jodo Shinshu (Shinran) states:

    "Precisely what Shinran Shonin argued against another of Honen Shonin's disciples who was saying that salvation through the Nembutsu occurs only after death. Shinran said, "No! Through the Nembutsu we are saved now, in this life!" It causes a furor among the disciples, and Honen intervened and supported Shinran's position."

    It appears that Rick is again mistaken about the teachings of his own sect or is he distancing himself from the imbecile Shinran?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Pure Land, a repost of an essay by Graham Lamont(1)

    I. The "Last Five Hundred Years" and the Latter Dharma
    (Mappo) An old claim of the Pure Land believers against the
    Hokekyo or Lotus Sutra is that this Sutra, as opposed to
    their Three Pure Land Sutras (Jodo Sambukyo ), is
    inappropriate to our time, the age of the Latter Dharma
    (Mappo). A variant of this contention has now been advanced
    by the claim that the Hokekyo is limited only to the fifth
    five hundred years since the Buddha and is irrelevant to the
    present age, since by the usual reckoning (from 949 B.C.E.)
    this period of the fifth five hundred years has passed. Thus
    once again they try to make the Supreme Sutra as an
    irrelevant teaching when in reality it is the teaching for
    the salvation of the beings of our age and is especially
    left for them. Let us argue following the Sutra-based
    teachings of Nichiren Shonin the Great Bodhisattva who was
    sent by the Eternal Lord Shakya as His Messenger to the
    people of the Latter Dharma to begin the spread of the
    Truth.

    First we shall consider the misinterpretation of the term
    "last five hundred years" by the partisans of the Pure Land
    teaching (which is centered on the Buddha Amida in the Pure
    Land of Gokuraku in the Western Quarter): they assume that
    this expression "last five hundred years" in the twenty
    third chapter of the Hokekyo refers to that period alone,
    but it is clear from other passages in the Sutra that the
    Buddha meant this Hokekyo for the whole of the ten thousand
    years of the Latter Dharma: Directly following upon the
    revelation of the Eternal Shakyamuni in the sixteenth
    chapter, the next chapter says:

    "In the evil era, the time of the Latter Dharma
    Those who can keep this Sutra"

    It imposes no limitation relating to the "last five hundred
    years" of the five five-hundred-year periods as described in
    the Daijikkyo. Clearly the teaching was to begin to spread
    throughout the world when the other teachings were being
    destroyed. Thus the Tendai masters rightly said that the
    literal interpretation of "the last five hundred years" was
    a teaching at first sight, a surface interpretation (ichio)
    and that, in accordance with the Sutra, at second sight
    (saio) it is the whole ten thousand years of the Latter
    Dharma. Again Nichiren Shonin in his "Go gohyaku sai gomon"
    (STN, v. 3, 2293) notes that the verses of the "Chapter of
    Practices of Peaceful Joy"

    13:
    In the Last Era
    The Ones who keep this Sutra
    With regard to the householders and religious
    As well as those who are not Bodhisattvas
    Ought to produce compassion (T.9.39a)

    The term "Last Era" (in the Japanese reading "nochi no sue
    no yo" or "nochi no masse" or "later end/final era") seems
    to emphasize its being the whole or even the later part of
    age of the Latter Dharma. In any case one cannot say that
    this refers to the literal "last five hundred years" alone.
    Further, Nichiren Shonin cites the phrase "within (or in the
    midst of) of the Latter Dharma" (T.9.37c-38a, cited in the
    Kaimoku sho (STN, v.1, 592) and also in the Kyo gyo sho
    gosho (STN, v. 2, 1481) where it is rightly glossed as
    meaning the ten thousand years of the Latter Dharma. If the
    Pure Land partisans wish to limit the spread of the Hokekyo
    to "within" the last five hundred years, meaning the
    beginning of the Latter Dharma, they must accept the spread
    "within" the Latter Dharma since the same "within" or "in
    the midst of" (chu) is used for both expressions. The Tendai
    masters such as Chan-jan (Myoraku Daishi) are thus correct
    in saying the "five hundred" years are "temporarily
    according to the time when the Great Teaching is to spread"
    (Hokke mongu ki 1B (T. 34. 157b))

    cont....

    ReplyDelete
  15. The Daijikkyo clearly emphasizes the destruction of "Pure
    Dharma" meaning the Lesser Vehicle and Provisional Great
    Vehicle Sutras; by contrast, the Lotus Sutra emphasizes the
    "wide proclamation and spreading" (kosen rufu) at the same
    time, the "last five hundred years", which means the
    beginning of the time when this teaching of the Hokekyo
    would spread through the world.

    The Daijikkyo says that the Pure Dharma will sink and be
    hidden and, although it is a sutra previous to the Lotus
    Sutra and, therefore, an expedient, its prophecy is
    confirmed in the Lotus Sutra in the "Chapter of the
    Practices of Peaceful Joy" 14 when it says, "The Bodhisattva
    Mahasattvas who in the Last Era, when the Dharma is about to
    be extinguished, receive and keep, read and recite this
    Sutra Canon are not to harbor a mind of jealousy and envy or
    sycophancy and deception." (T.9.38b) Clearly this
    "extinction" of the Dharma refers to the other teachings,
    for this Sutra is to be spread when the other teachings are
    destroyed at the beginning of the Latter Dharma.

    Now must turn to the relative value of the statements made
    by the Hokekyo and the Pure Land Sutras.

    In the Sutra of Immeasurable Meanings (Muryogikyo),
    immediately before preaching the Hokekyo, the Buddha states:
    "For more than forty years I have never yet revealed the
    Truth." (T.9.386b) And with the Previous Teachings,
    expedient teachings. "Passing through immeasurable,
    boundless, inconceivable asamkheya kalpas, they in the end
    were not able to achieve Supreme Bodhi." (T.9.387a) In other
    words, those seeking enlightenment were not able to attain
    the Supreme Bodhi or Enlightenment of the Buddha up to this
    point, following the teachings of the Buddha. This is
    because up to that time He had not revealed the Real
    Teaching but had put forth only Provisional or Expedient
    Teachings, which conformed to the capacities (ki) of a
    particular audience or group of beings. Immediately after
    the Sutra of Immeasurable Meanings the Buddha preaches the
    Lotus Sutra or Hokekyo, in which it proclaims: "As to the
    World-honored One's Dharma, after a long time, He is
    certainly going to preach the Truth." ("Chapter of
    Expedience" 2 (T.9.6a))

    Hence we should know that the Truth, formerly withheld in
    the Buddha's temporal career, is only now and of necessity
    going to be revealed in this Sutra. The teachings of the
    other Sutras, before this time, are now abolished as mere
    expedients, temporary, provisional measures to lead people
    onward to the Truth of the One Buddha Vehicle. "I
    forthrightly abandon expedience and only preach the Supreme
    Way." ("Chapter of Expedience" 2 (T.9.10a))

    Note that Chan-jan (Myoraku Daishi) glasses "abandon"
    (she/sha) as "abolish" (fei/hai) (Hokke gengi shakushin 1A
    (T.33.S16c)) Thus we should know that the Buddha is now
    preaching only the absolute truth, the One Vehicle leading
    directly to Buddhahood. Now the Pure Land Sutras are from
    the third period of the Buddha's lifetime, the Hodo
    (Vaipulya) period (roughly thirty years), previous to the
    Prajnaparamita (Perfection of Wisdom) Sutras.

    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  16. And as we might expect in the case of all Sutras that are
    provisional, mere expedients for a particular audience, the
    Sutras before the Hokekyo, contradict themselves. The Pure
    Land partisans claim that the Muryojukyo will outlast all
    other Sutras by one hundred years. (T.12.279a11-12) But note
    that another version of this sutra, the Bussetsu Muryo shojo
    byodo kyo states, "After by Parinirvana the Way of the
    Sutras will remain for one thousand years; after a thousand
    years the Way of the Sutras will be cut off; I am
    compassionate to all, and especially retain this Sutra
    Dharma to stay and abide a hundred years; in the midst of
    the hundred years finally then it will cease, stop, and be
    cut off." (T.1Z.299c11-13 and n. 12 from the Ming and Yuan
    editions) (According to some commentators (T.12.279a, n. 3)
    there is also to be another thousand years before that last
    hundred years; this is very interesting because, according
    to the standard reckoning of the time of the Buddha's
    Parinirvana (949 B.C.E.), the two thousand year period plus
    the one hundred years would be in the first part of Honen's
    lifetime (1133-1212), or about 1151 C.E. In other words,
    according to this version the teaching of this Sutra is
    supposed to cease about the time Honen, the great exponent
    of Pure Land (exclusive Nembutsu) is starting on his career!


    We may also note that this alternate translation with the
    actual years is an older translation (supposedly by
    Chih-ch'ien from the Later Han) than the more standard
    version of the Muryojukyo in use by Pure Land partisans now;
    although the thousand year passage occurs only in the Yuan
    and Ming versions, if this is, indeed, a slightly older
    version then the actual calculation of the years were
    deleted for some reason from the standard version translated
    by K'ang Seng-k'ai in the Ts'ao Wei period (220-280).

    But even leaving this aside, Nichiren Shonin points out
    (Shugo kokka ron, STN, v. 1, '00-102) that the
    pronouncements of the sutras previous to the Lotus Sutra are
    not determinate, because, for example the Ninnokyo or Sutra
    of the Benevolent Kings predicts it will last eight thousand
    years past the age of the Latter Dharma.

    By contrast, the words of the Hokekyo are final and we have
    shown its destiny is to be propagated throughout the age of
    the Latter Dharma beginning with the fifth five hundred
    years. Nichiren Shonin explains the text "After My
    Extinction within the five hundred years after (or the last
    five hundred years) they shall widely proclaim and spread it
    and not allow it to be cut off." "The character 'after'
    [last] following on 'After My Extinction' is the character
    'after' (go) in 'after the various sutras of the more than
    forty years are completely extinguished.'" (Shugo kokka ron,
    STN, v. 1, 102 l. 14) In other words, Nichiren Shonin
    interprets the last five hundred years as "after" the other
    (merely provisional) Sutras have run their course and
    disappear or virtually disappear because they are no longer
    of any effect. (N.B. The rendering of the kambun text with
    the word "after" instead of "last ' fits Nichiren Shonin's
    reading in this instance; both renderings are perfectly
    legitimate; the problem is more with the word order and
    vocabulary of English than with the original Chinese. This
    particular rendering is also in the future tense as a
    prophecy but it can also be read as,an imperative, which
    really does not affect the sense here.)

    II. The Pure Land (Nembutsu) Followers claim that Amida is
    Our Savior The Pure Land believers advance the claim that
    the Buddha Amida is the special savior of the people of this
    Saha World in the age of the Latter Dharma. But let us note
    the Eighteenth Vow of Amida in (Muryojukyo), which is
    central to Rebirth (ojo) in the Pure Land faith:

    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  17. "Even though I should obtain Buddhahood, when the beings of
    the Ten Directions believe and rejoice with all their heart,
    desiring to be born in my country, if they are not born
    [there], I shall not accept True Enlightenment; only
    excepting the Five Rebellious Sins and Blasphemy against the
    True Dharma." (T.12.268a26-28)

    The Pure Land patriarchs have developed various clever
    arguments to undo the obvious meaning of this sutra text:
    that Amida in His central vow excludes from His Pure Land
    all those who commit the Five Rebellious Sins and those who
    commit blasphemy against the Dharma. Now Pure Land
    commentators tried to use texts of the Great Parinirvana
    Sutra (Daihatsunehangyd) (T.12.554a-b, 574c) to show that
    the people of our age, the "Ever sinking" and those "Who
    emerged from the sea but then sank back again", were saved
    by the Buddha Amida and those above this level were saved by
    the Buddha Shakya. This idea appears to have come from
    Shan-tao's interpretation but following an interpretation by
    Genshin (942-1017), one of the greatest exponents of Pure
    Land doctrine in the Tendai Sect,1 Nichiren Shonin
    demonstrates that these two Watanabe Hoyo, "Nichiren Shonin
    no shukyo ni okeru 'hobo' no igi" ("The Significance of
    'Blasphemy against the Dharma' in Nichiren Shonin's
    Religion" in Miyazaki Eishu and Motai Kyoko, eds. Nichiren
    Shonin kenkyu, 96 classes of those "ever sinking" and
    "emerging, then sinking back" are, in fact, those who
    blaspheme against the Dharma and those guilty Of the Five
    Rebellious Sins, but as we have just seen, the Buddha Amida
    excludes these very people. (Note also the phrase in the
    "Chapter of Expedience" 2 (T.9.9c), "...the multitudes of
    beings, sinking in suffering, unable to believe this Dharma,
    because they destroy the Dharma, not believing, will fall to
    the Three Evil Ways [of Rebirth]." This shows that the
    beings sinking in the sea of suffering here do so because of
    unbelief in the Truth and efficacy of this Sutra.) By
    contrast, the Concluding Sutra of the Hokekyo, the Fugengyd,
    actually proclaims that these excluded sinners, those who
    commit the Five Rebellious Sins and Blasphemy against the
    Dharma, to be the very capacities for the Hokekyo :

    "If kings, great ministers, brahmins, householders, wealthy
    householders, officials, these people and so on, greedily
    seeking with no revulsion, commit the Five Rebellious Sins,
    blaspheme the Hodo Sutra and are possessed of the Ten Evils,
    the retribution for these Great Evils is to fall to the Evil
    Ways of Rebirth surpassing a torrential rain: they must
    certainly be going to fall to the Avici Hell. If they desire
    to extinguish and be rid of these karmic hindrances, they
    ought to give rise to repentance and change and do penance
    for their sins." (T.9.394a) (N.B.: the terms Hodo Sutra
    applies to!his Hokekyo in this instance, as is generally
    acknowledged.)

    Among the tive types of repentance which are mentioned there
    is this: "they should only profoundly believe in the Cause
    and Effect, the Way of the One Reali1y, and know that the
    Buddha is not Extinguished." (T.9.394b)

    There can be no doubt that this particular form of
    repentance is centered on the principal teaching of the
    Hokekyo: the One Reality revealed in the "Chapter of
    Expedience" 2 and the Eternal Buddha revealed in the
    "Chapter of the Measure of Life of the Tathagata" 16. In
    other words, among the various types of repentance
    recommended by the Concluding Sutra of the Hokekyo is the
    very faith preached by Nichiren Shonin. The response to
    Blasphemy against the Dharma and all other types of sins is,
    indeed, the repentance by believing in the true Hokke faith!

    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  18. Moreover, Blasphemy against the Dharma is the very worst of
    diseases, incurable save by "the One Buddha Lord Shakya's
    Excellent Medicine of the Sublime Sutra" (Ota nyuo dono
    gohenji or "Reply to the Tonsured Layman Ota", STN, v, 2,
    1116 l. 8), for it is written in the "Chapter of the
    Original Matter of the Bodhisattva Yakuo" 23, "This Sutra is
    the Excellent Medicine for the Diseases of the people of
    Jambudvipa: if persons have a disease and get to hear this
    Sutra, the disease at once shall be extinguished. "
    (T.9.54c25-26) It is this Sutra alone which can cure the sin
    of Blasphemy against the Dharma, which is unbelief or wrong
    belief.

    The Great Parinirvana Sutra (Daihatsunehangyo) says, "If
    there are those who have disparaged and blasphemed this True
    Dharma, they can themselves change and do penance, returning
    to the Dharma ... except for this True Dharma there is no
    further salvation and protection; for this reason they ought
    to return to the True Dharma." (T,12.425b, cited by Nichiren
    Shonin in the "Reply to the Tonsured Layman Ota", STN, v. Z,
    1116) It is clear. as both the Tendai Masters and Nichiren
    Shonin have shown from the Sutra texts, that this Great
    Parinirvana Sutra is, in fact, the Diffusion Section to
    Lotus Sutra . (E.g., the Shugo kokka ron, STN, v. 1,
    130-132, noting especially the passage where the Great
    Parinirvana Sutra (T.12.420a) points back to the salvation
    of the unsavable Shravakas in the Lotus Sutra; so the Great
    Parinirvana Sutra is the "gleaning" to the "great harvest"
    of the Lotus Sutra. The Lotus Sutra alone has saved the
    Shravakas, thus fulfilling the vows of all Bodhisattvas to
    save all beings and alone has revealed the True Attainment
    of Buddhahood in the Most Distant Past, that is to say, the
    Eternal Life of the Buddha Shakyamuni.) When it refers to
    this True Dharma, it is referring back to the Supreme Lotus
    Sutra.

    Now what is Blasphemy? The Pure Land (Nembutsu) people and
    others will argue that they do not "disparage and blaspheme"
    the Dharma of the Lotus Sutra.

    Let us answer from the Sutra text in the "Chapter of the
    Parable" 3: first, the Buddha Shakyamuni proclaims, "Now
    these three worlds are all my own; the beings therein are
    all my children. But now this place has many calamities and
    hardships; I alone can guard and save them." (T.9.14c26- 28)
    (Note that this applies not only to the Buddha Shakyamuni's
    Historical Manifestation in the first half of the Lotus
    Sutra (the Shakumon) but also in the second half (the
    Hommon) where the Buddha proclaims, "I likewise am the
    Father of the World, The One who saves from the various
    sufferings and travails." ("Chapter of the Measure of Life
    of the Tathagata" 16) Thus it is the Buddha Shakyamuni,
    revealed as the Eternal Buddha, who is our true savior, the
    rescuer of the unsavable!

    Thus far from being alien to all beings (as well as the
    non-sentient support retribution) of this Saha World, as
    some Pure Land teachers and others claim, the Buddha Shakya
    is the Lord, Teacher, and Parent of this World from the Most
    Distant Past. So He has revealed Himself as uniquely the
    Parent and Savior of us beings. Note that even in the
    intermediate period after His True Enlightenment in the
    inconceivable past it is the Buddha Shakyamuni who,
    manifested as the Brahmacarin Hokai (Hokai bonji) performing
    the Bodhisattva practice made a vow that "gathering the
    multitudes of beings driven forth from the Pure Lands of the
    Ten Directions, I shall save them." (From fasc. 6 the
    Hikekyo or Sutra of the Flower of Compassion) cited in the
    "Letter to Jorembo" or Jorembo gosho) (STN, v. 2, 1076; also
    "Epistle to Lord Matsuno" (Matsuno dona goshosoku), STN. v,
    2, 1277 and cf. Nichiren Shonin ibun jiten, 1004a) Contrast
    the vows of the Bodhisattva Hozo who as the Buddha Amida
    abandons this Saha World and also its people excluding those
    who commit Blasphemy and the Five Rebellious Sins.

    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  19. The Buddha Shakya has said, as we noted above, that it is
    this Sutra, the Hokekyo, that is His revelation of the
    Truth, and yet, He continues immediately afterwards in the
    same "Chapter of the Parable" 3, "Though I again teach and
    (decree, yet they do not do not believe and receive."
    (T.9.14c28-29) Likewise He urges: "I for the sake of beings
    by means of this parable preach the One Buddha Vehicle; if
    you [plural] can believe and accept these words, all in
    every case are going to become able to obtain the Buddha
    Way. This Vehicle is subtle and sublime, pure and foremost,
    in the various worlds there is none superior." (T.9.15a5-8)

    He then warns against disbelief: "If persons do not believe
    and disparage and blaspheme this Sutra, then they cut off
    all the worlds' Buddha seeds. (Or again if they frown and
    harbor doubts and confusions, you should hear preached the
    retribution of this person's sin . "These persons at life's
    end will enter Avici Hell for fully one kalpa and, when the
    kalpa is exhausted, will again be born like this turning on
    to numberless kalpas and emerging from hell will fall to the
    beasts...." (T.9.15b2Z-c2) clearly disbelief is the source
    of all this; as faith is the source of salvation, so lack of
    faith and doubt are the source of evil retribution. (We must
    note despite the length of this terrible punishment in Avici
    and other evil places of rebirth, this is not eternal
    damnation.)

    According to the buddha in His Real (non-expedient)
    Teaching, unbelief, harboring doubts, in regard to this
    Sutra will lead to retribution in the Avici (Unremitting)
    Hell and other evil states of rebirth through countless
    aeons.

    Now the Pure Land followers still say they have not
    "blasphemed and disparaged" yet it is clear that they do not
    believe in the efficacy of this Sutra for people of this
    Latter Age; rather they harbor doubts about it and teach at
    variance to what the Buddha has said in a final and
    authoritative way in this very Lotus Sutra; for do they not
    follow Shan-tao in saying "not one in a thousand" attain by
    the Hokekyo and other sutras when this Sutra proclaims all
    shall attain by this One Vehicle? Do they not follow Honen's
    famous prescription in the Senchahu shu to "abandon, close,
    put aside, cast away' (sha hei kaku ho) the Lotus Sutra
    among the other sutras'? Is this what the Lotus Sutra
    teaches: that we should abandon it now in this age, far from
    the time of the historical Buddha? Now the Pure Land
    partisans will most probably argue in one or the other of
    two ways

    1) They claim that, in following Honen, they never intended
    to criticize the Hokekyo but merely meant that "the truth
    [of the Lotus Sutra] is profound and the understanding [of
    the people of our age of the Latter Dharma] is slight" (ri
    jin ge mi); the Lotus Sutra, they claim, is only for great
    sages and not for ordinary unenlightened worldlings: its
    practices are too difficult.

    Let us see what the Diffusion Section (ruzubun) within the
    Sutra (as opposed to the separate Diffusion Section Sutras,
    the Fugengy6 and the Daihatsunehangyo) has to say: "Still
    further, after the Extinction of the Tathagata, if they hear
    this Sutra and do not disparage it but give rise to the mind
    of following joy, you should know it is already the aspect
    of profound faith and understanding." (The "Chapter of the
    Distribution of Merits" 17 (T.9.45b22- 24))

    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  20. Now this passage describes the Five Ranks (gohon) after the
    Extinction of (the historical manifestation of) the Buddha.
    The person who hears and does not blaspheme against this
    Supreme Dharma but has the joy of following in faith
    already has the aspect of profound faith and understanding.
    Note that understanding is not a prerequisite for this but
    only "following joy", the very first stage of the spiritual
    journey. Clearly the Buddha intends this Sutra for beings
    such as ourselves. (Note that in this same chapter this is
    in the period of the Latter Dharma for in the next stage of
    faith, "keeping" this Sutra, it is specifically said to be
    "in the evil era at the time of the Latter Dharma"
    (T.9.46a13).)

    Moreover, in the "Chapter of Following Joy" the vast merit
    of one who has heard this Sutra even at fiftieth hand is
    proclaimed by the Buddha yet this person is clearly even
    less spiritually advanced than the person who first heard it
    in the Buddha's congregation and has not yet even entered
    the level of the Identity of Contemplation and Practice
    (kangyo soku) but is at the level of the Identity of Name
    (myoji soku) where real understanding or practice have not
    yet really begun. (Note that, unlike the first forty-nine,
    this fiftieth person has not even preached the Dharma to
    someone else and so is at the most elementary level.) Yet
    such "shallow" merit is actually vastly superior to that of
    the great sages of the teachings of the Previous Sutras.
    (Tayu sakan dono gohenji, STN, v. 2, 1852) That this should
    be so is explained by the well-known principle, "Because the
    more the teaching is Real, the more the [spiritual] level is
    lowered.") The Sutra itself says: "When there are beings
    who, hearing that the Buddha's Lifespan is of such great
    length, can produce so much as one thought of faith and
    understanding, the merit which they obtain shall have no
    limit or measure. If there are good sons or good daughters
    who for the sake of Anuttara- samyak-sambodhi practice the
    Five Paramitas, the Dana Paramita, the Sila Paramita, the
    Kshanti Paramita, the Virya Paramita, and the Dhyana
    Paramita, excluding the Prajna Paramita, when one compares
    this merit to the former merit, it does not reach one part
    of a hundred parts, a thousand parts, or one hundred
    trillion parts and it is something even calculations and
    similes cannot know. If there are good sons or good
    daughters who have merit such as this, there would be no
    instance of backsliding in Anuttara-samyak-sambodhi."
    (T.9.44cl 8-29)

    Although this passage is technically within the Four Faiths
    (Four Levels of Belief with increasing levels of
    understanding and practice), which are practiced in the
    Buddha's Lifetime, Chan-jan (Janran, Myoraku, the sixth
    Chinese Patriarch of the Tendai (T'ien-t'ai) Sect) in the
    Hokke mongu ki points out that the Four Faiths and Five
    Ranks are practically the same, so that "one thought of
    faith and understanding" is applicable to the time after the
    historical Buddha; thus a single thought of faith in this
    Sutra and specifically in the Buddha's Immeasurable
    Lifespan, as preached in the Sixteenth Chapter, is superior
    to all Five Paramitas or Perfections except the Prajna
    Paramita or Perfection of Wisdom since that is identical to
    this Sutra itself. Such faith is at least as "easy" as the
    Nembutsu but is surely superior in merit. (Incidentally the
    verse paraphrase of the above passage affirms that it is
    "one thought of faith" without any mention of understanding
    as a prerequisite (T.9.45a26). And Chan-jan also affirms in
    the Hoke mongu ki 9B (T.34.342b) that the first faith has no
    understanding.

    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Clearly this Lotus Sutra is not something meant for great
    sages alone; it has nothing to do with entering into a
    trance (samadhi) and so on. Thus the Fugenqyo says one who
    practices "though not entering samadhi, only recites and
    keeps" (T.9.389c) and the sixth patriarch of the Tendai
    Sect, Myoraku Daishi (Chan-jan) glosses, "With
    unconcentrated (lit., "scattered") minds reciting the Dharma
    Flower (Hokke) without entering trance and samadhi, sitting,
    standing, or walking single-mindedly think on the characters
    of the Dharma Flower. " (Maka shikan bugyo den guketsu 2-
    2.18v (T.46.192c). Nichiren Shonin that this is surely the
    easy practice for the unenlightened worldlings of the Latter
    Dharma, for it makes no distinction as to our behavior and
    has nothing to do with trance but demands single-minded
    devotion and he says, "'Think on the characters of the
    Dharma Flower' means that this Sutra does not resemble the
    characters of the various sutras; though one recites one
    character, it encompasses the characters of the Eighty
    thousand Jewelled Stores [of the Buddha Dharma] and gathers
    in the merit of all the Buddhas." (Shugo kokka ron, STN, v.
    1, 110)

    For those who wish to be reborn in a Pure Land, in the
    "Chapter of Devadatta" 12 it says, "The Buddha addressed the
    bhikshus, 'In a future era It there are good sons or good
    daughters who hear the "Chapter of Devadatta" of the Sublime
    Dharma Flower Sutra (Myohokekyo ) and with a pure mind
    believe and reverence, not producing doubts and confusion,
    they shall not fall to the hells, hungry ghosts, or beasts
    but be born before the Buddhas of the Ten Directions and in
    the place where they are born they shall constantly hear
    this Sutra; if they are born among humans or gods they shall
    receive superior and sublime joy. If before a Buddha, they
    shall be born by transformation in a lotus flower.'"
    (T.9.35a14- 18)

    Note that there is no exclusion of Blasphemers against the
    Dharma, because this Sutra is the very Teaching that rescues
    such evil people. Thus this clear promise of the Buddha is
    specifically focused on the chapter where the most evil
    person in Buddhist tradition is shown to attain Buddhahood.
    Moreover, even in excellent heavenly and human rebirths,
    they shall be able to hear this Supreme Lotus Sutra, a fact
    which is most important for in such a rebirth they shall
    always have access to Buddhahood.

    2) They assert that they only meant to combine their
    Nembutsu (believing in and chanting the Name of Amida
    (shomyo)) with the Lotus Sutra and dedicating the merits to
    Rebirth in the Pure Land of Gokuraku presided over by the
    Buddha Amida in the Western Direction. The Lotus Sutra says
    in the "Chapter of the Parable" (T.9.16a), "Only rejoicing
    to receive and keep the Great Vehicle Sutra Canon, not even
    receiving one verse of other Sutras"; since the "Chapter of
    Expedience" 2 (T.9.8a) declares:

    "Now is properly the time;
    I shall determinately preach the Great Vehicle;
    The Nine Sections of the Dharma I
    Preach following and according with the masses of beings:
    Having them enter the great Vehicle is the fundamental And
    for that reason I preach this Sutra,"

    cont...

    ReplyDelete

  22. then, in effect, this Sutra is the True or Real Great
    Vehicle (Mahayana) and none of the other sutras are really
    so; in that sense they are the Lesser Vehicle; we are not
    even to receive (i.e., accept out of faith) a single verse
    of these other sutras, including the "Mahayana" sutras which
    are not truly the Great Vehicle.

    Likewise in the "Chapter of the Divine Powers of the
    Tathagata" 21 states: "For that reason you, after the
    Tathagata's Extinction, should single-mindedly receive and
    keep, read and recite, explain and preach, copy and write,
    and practice in accordance with the preaching." (T.9.52a20-
    21)

    The Sutra says one is to practice it single-mindedly, i.e.,
    to the exclusion of other sutras and teachings.

    Therefore, in the age of the Latter Dharma, the time for
    this Sutra, no other practice or teaching should be employed
    and that restriction applies to the Nembutsu.

    end of part one......

    ReplyDelete
  23. A Refutation of the Nembutsu(2) by Graham Lamont

    Now the Pure Land followers still say they have not "blasphemed and disparaged" yet it is clear that they do not believe in the efficacy of this Sutra for people of this Latter Age; rather they harbor doubts about it and teach at variance to what the Buddha has said in a final and authoritative way in this very Lotus Sutra; for do they not follow Shan-tao in saying "not one in a thousand" attain by the Hokekyo and other sutras when this Sutra proclaims all shall attain by this One Vehicle? Do they not follow Honen's famous prescription in the Senchahu shu to "abandon, close, put aside, cast away' (sha hei kaku ho) the Lotus Sutra among the other sutras'? Is this what the Lotus Sutra teaches: that we should abandon it now in this age, far from the time of the historical Buddha? Now the Pure Land partisans will most probably argue in one or the other of two ways 1) They claim that, in following Honen, they never intended to criticize the Hokekyo but merely meant that "the truth [of the Lotus Sutra] is profound and
    the understanding [of the people of our age of the Latter Dharma] is slight" (ri jin ge mi); the Lotus Sutra, they claim, is only for great sages and not for ordinary unenlightened worldlings: its practices are too difficult.

    Let us see what the Diffusion Section (ruzubun) within the Sutra (as opposed to the separate Diffusion Section Sutras, the Fugengy6 and the Daihatsunehangyo) has to say: "Still further, after the Extinction of the Tathagata, if they hear this Sutra and do not disparage it but give rise to the mind of following joy, you should know it is already the aspect of profound faith and understanding." (The "Chapter of the Distribution of Merits" 17 (T.9.45b22- 24))

    Now this passage describes the Five Ranks (gohon) after the Extinction of
    (the historical manifestation of) the Buddha. The person who hears and does not blaspheme against this Supreme Dharma but has the joy of following in faith already has the aspect of profound faith and understanding. Note that understanding is not a prerequisite for this but
    only "following joy", the very first stage of the spiritual journey. Clearly
    the Buddha intends this Sutra for beings such as ourselves. (Note that in this same chapter this is in the period of the Latter Dharma for in the next stage of faith, "keeping" this Sutra, it is specifically said to be "in the evil
    era at the time of the Latter Dharma" (T.9.46a13).)
    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  24. Moreover, in the "Chapter of Following Joy" the vast merit of one who has heard this Sutra even at fiftieth hand is proclaimed by the Buddha yet this person is clearly even less spiritually advanced than the person who first heard it in the Buddha's congregation and has not yet even entered the level of the Identity of Contemplation and Practice (kangyo soku) but is at the level of the Identity of Name (myoji soku) where real understanding or practice have not yet really begun. (Note that, unlike the first forty-nine, this fiftieth person has not even preached the Dharma to someone else and so is at the most elementary level.) Yet such "shallow" merit is actually vastly superior to that of the great sages of the teachings of the Previous Sutras. (Tayu sakan dono gohenji, STN, v. 2, 1852) That this should be so is explained by the well-known principle, "Because the more the teaching is Real, the more the [spiritual] level is lowered.") The Sutra itself says: "When there are beings who, hearing that the Buddha's Lifespan is of such great length, can produce so much as one thought of faith and understanding, the merit which they obtain shall have no limit or measure. If there are good sons or good daughters who for the sake of Anuttara- samyak-sambodhi practice the Five Paramitas, the Dana Paramita, the
    Sila Paramita, the Kshanti Paramita, the Virya Paramita, and the Dhyana
    Paramita, excluding the Prajna Paramita, when one compares this merit to the former merit, it does not reach one part of a hundred parts, a thousand parts, or one hundred trillion parts and it is something even calculations and similes cannot know. If there are good sons or good daughters who have merit such as this, there would be no instance of backsliding in Anuttara-samyak-sambodhi." (T.9.44cl 8-29)

    Although this passage is technically within the Four Faiths (Four Levels of
    Belief with increasing levels of understanding and practice), which are
    practiced in the Buddha's Lifetime, Chan-jan (Janran, Myoraku, the sixth Chinese Patriarch of the Tendai (T'ien-t'ai) Sect) in the Hokke mongu ki points out that the Four Faiths and Five Ranks are practically the same, so that "one thought of faith and understanding" is applicable to the time after the historical Buddha; thus a single thought of faith in this Sutra and specifically in the Buddha's Immeasurable Lifespan, as preached in
    the Sixteenth Chapter, is superior to all Five Paramitas or Perfections except the Prajna Paramita or Perfection of Wisdom since that is identical to this Sutra itself. Such faith is at least as "easy" as the Nembutsu but is surely superior in merit. (Incidentally the verse paraphrase of the above passage affirms that it is "one thought of faith" without any mention of understanding as a prerequisite (T.9.45a26). And Chan-jan also affirms in the Hoke mongu ki 9B (T.34.342b) that the first faith has no understanding.

    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  25. Clearly this Lotus Sutra is not something meant for great sages alone; it has nothing to do with entering into a trance (samadhi) and so on. Thus the
    Fugenqyo says one who practices "though not entering samadhi, only recites and keeps" (T.9.389c) and the sixth patriarch of the Tendai Sect, Myoraku Daishi (Chan-jan) glosses, "With unconcentrated (lit., "scattered") minds reciting the Dharma Flower (Hokke) without entering trance and samadhi, sitting, standing, or walking single-mindedly think on the characters of the Dharma Flower. " (Maka shikan bugyo den guketsu 2- 2.18v (T.46.192c). Nichiren Shonin teaches that this is surely the easy practice for the unenlightened worldlings of the Latter Dharma, for it makes no distinction as to our behavior and has nothing to do with trance but demands single-minded devotion and he says, "'Think on the characters of the Dharma Flower' means that this Sutra does not resemble the
    characters of the various sutras; though one recites one character, it
    encompasses the characters of the Eighty thousand Jewelled Stores [of the Buddha Dharma] and gathers in the merit of all the Buddhas." (Shugo kokka ron, STN, v. 1, 110)

    For those who wish to be reborn in a Pure Land, in the "Chapter of Devadatta" 12 it says, "The Buddha addressed the bhikshus, 'In a future era It there are good sons or good daughters who hear the "Chapter of Devadatta" of the Sublime Dharma Flower Sutra (Myohokekyo ) and with a pure mind believe and reverence, not producing doubts and confusion, they shall not fall to the hells, hungry ghosts, or beasts but be born before the Buddhas of the Ten Directions and in the place where they are born they shall constantly hear this Sutra; if they are born among humans or gods they shall receive superior and sublime joy. If before a Buddha, they shall be born by transformation in a lotus flower.'" (T.9.35a14- 18)

    Note that there is no exclusion of Blasphemers against the Dharma, because this Sutra is the very Teaching that rescues such evil people. Thus this clear promise of the Buddha is specifically focused on the chapter where the most evil person in Buddhist tradition is shown to attain Buddhahood. Moreover, even in excellent heavenly and human rebirths,
    they shall be able to hear this Supreme Lotus Sutra, a fact which is most important for in such a rebirth they shall always have access to Buddhahood.

    2) They assert that they only meant to combine their Nembutsu (believing in and chanting the Name of Amida (shomyo)) with the Lotus Sutra and dedicating the merits to Rebirth in the Pure Land of Gokuraku presided over by the Buddha Amida in the Western Direction. The Lotus Sutra says
    in the "Chapter of the Parable" (T.9.16a), "Only rejoicing to receive and keep the Great Vehicle Sutra Canon, not even receiving one verse of other Sutras"; since the "Chapter of Expedience" 2 (T.9.8a) declares:

    "Now is properly the time; I shall determinately preach the Great Vehicle; The Nine Sections of the Dharma I Preach following and according with the masses of beings: Having them enter the great Vehicle is the fundamental And for that reason I preach this Sutra,"

    cont...

    ReplyDelete

  26. Then, in effect, this Sutra is the True or Real Great Vehicle (Mahayana) and
    none of the other sutras are really so; in that sense they are the Lesser
    Vehicle; we are not even to receive (i.e., accept out of faith) a single verse of these other sutras, including the "Mahayana" sutras which are not truly the Great Vehicle.

    Likewise in the "Chapter of the Divine Powers of the Tathagata" 21 states: "For that reason you, after the Tathagata's Extinction, should single-mindedly receive and keep, read and recite, explain and preach, copy and write, and practice in accordance with the preaching." (T.9.52a20- 21)

    The Sutra says one is to practice it single-mindedly, i.e., to the exclusion of
    other sutras and teachings.

    Therefore, in the age of the Latter Dharma, the time for this Sutra, no other
    practice or teaching should be employed and that restriction applies to the
    Nembutsu.

    ReplyDelete
  27. A Refutation of the Nembutsu(3)

    Thus we can conclude from the main text of the Hokekyo, from the Fugengyo, and also from the Great Parinirvana Sutra the remedy for the spiritual illness of Blasphemy, which is, in essence, the denial of the supremacy, relevance, and efficacy of the Hokekyo to save all beings and
    especially the beings of the Latter Dharma.

    The claim of the Pure Land partisans is epitomized in a famous remark of
    Shan-tao that with Sutras such as the Hokekyo "not one in thousand" attains Enlightenment or Rebirth in the Pure Land because these Sutras are for sages. Against this "not one in thousand", Nichiren Shonin cites the promise of the Hokekyo: "If they hear the Dharma there is not one who does not attain Buddhahood." (The "Chapter of Expedience" (T.9.9b)) and he asks the simple but profound question: whom do you wish to believe: the Buddha or the human teacher Shan-tao? As Nichiren Shonin explains
    later, it means that "of the people who keep this Sutra a hundred of a hundred, a thousand of a thousand, not missing even one person, become
    Buddhas." ("Reply to the Lady Nun Ueno" (Ueno ama gozen gohenji), STN, v, 2, 1890) (Likewise we can cite from the same chapter, "Be they Shravakas or Bodhisattvas. hearing even one verse of the Dharma that I preach, they shall all attain Buddhahood (or "become Buddhas") without doubt (or "there is no doubt".)" (T.9.8a)

    (A number of the above arguments also follow the "Letter to Jorembo" (Jorembo gosho) (STN, v, 2, 1075) and the also the Nembutsu mugen jigoku sho (STN, v. 1, 37) and the Hoon sho (STN, v. 2, 1231))

    Now one more tactic of the Pure Land advocates, especially the Jodo Shinshu, is to claim that the Pure Land Sutras were preached at the same period as the Lotus Sutra; however, this argument does not
    work for the Buddha's words defeat them:

    "'Of the various sutras I have preached, Among these sutras, The Dharma Flower (Hokke) is the very foremost.'

    At that time the Buddha further announced to the Bodhisattva Mahasattva Yakuo, "The Sutra Canons which I preach are immeasurable thousands of tens of thousands of hundreds of thousands, those I have already preached, those I am now preaching, those I am going to preach. Yet among those this Dharma Flower Sutra is the very most difficult to believe and difficult to understand." (The "Chapter of the Dharma Teacher" 10: T.9.31b)

    cont...

    ReplyDelete
  28. From this we see that of all Sutras, including those now being preached, this Lotus Sutra is Supreme and surpasses all the Sutras, including the Pure Land Sutras, even if we allow that the Three Pure Land Sutras were preached at this same time as the Hokekyo ! It overrules all other Sutras with the Final Truth which the Lord Buddha preached. (incidentally this unique pronouncement of Lord Shakya that this Lotus Sutra surpasses any other of His other preachings also overrules any other preachings such as those claimed by the Tibetan Buddhists, who have lured away foolish people from the True Dharma by claiming that since there are even higher Esoteric (Tantric) forms of Buddhism than the ones known to Nichiren
    Shonin, these overrule the Hokekyo and invalidate Nichiren's teaching; however, the Buddha's pronouncement is absolute and final and applies to everything He ever preached or would preach; it does not depend on whether Nichiren Shonin knew or did not know of a particular Esoteric transmission. Moreover, Nichiren Shonin actually anticipates such an argument since he points out in the Hoon sho (STN, v. 2, 1196-1197) that the above phrase, "those I have already preached, those I am now preaching, those I am going to preach", summed up in the words, "already, now, about (to)" (in kambun, "i kon to"), includes any sutra of any kind not transmitted into China (and hence to Japan) or hidden in some place such as the palaces of the celestial gods or dragons, since the Buddha has pronounced these words in the "Chapter of the Dharma Teacher" 10 and has had them confirmed as "all true" by the Buddha Tahe from the Past (Chapter 11) and again by the Buddhas of the Ten Directions Who extend Their Miraculous Tongues (Chapter 21) with the various celestial and other gods (present from the "Chapter of the Preface" 1 as witnesses. Where
    could there be any sutra superior to this very Hokekyo?) 3) The Pure Land
    believers claim that a reference in the


    "Chapter of Yakuo" 23 (T,9.54b29-c2) supports their position:

    "If there is a woman who hears this Sutra Canon and practices it in
    accordance with the preaching, when her life ends here, she shall at once go to the abode of the Buddha Amida of the Anraku World..."

    However, note that this passage does not refer to the practices of the Pure
    Land Sect, the Nembutsu (shomyo or chanting the name of Amida) and so on but says that one must practice according to the preaching of this Lotus Sutra; we have already seen that such a correct practice is to be single-minded. excluding other Sutras and their practices (as we saw above) and, therefore, there is no question of mixing the practices or calling them equal: "The Kangyo [Kan Muryojukyo] is a Provisional Teaching; the Hokekyo is the Real Teaching: they cannot at all be equal." (Hokke shoshin jobutsu sho, STN, v. 2, 1428)

    Furthermore, Myoraku affirms, "One need not point further to the Kangyo and others." (Hokke mongu ki 10 (T.34.355b) In other words, the causal practice for Rebirth in the Pure Land Amida is the proper practice of the Hokekyo and not the Nembutsu or anything else. "Only the power of the Hokekyo alone measures up" to the task of saving women in this age
    of the Latter Dharma. (On the Rebirth of Woman (Nyonin ojo sho), STN, v. 1,349)

    cont...

    ReplyDelete

  29. Moreover, the phrase from Myoraku refers not merely to causal practice but the effect (Buddhahood) for neither the Buddha Amida nor the Pure Land of Anraku mentioned here are identical to that described in the Kangyo. In effect this Buddha and His Land are manifestations of a type of Pure Land from the eternal Pure Land revealed in the Sixteenth Chapter of the Lotus Sutra.

    We can conclude that it is, indeed, the Lotus Sutra that is the Sutra that
    teaches the Way to Rebirth and Enlightenment in this age of the Latter Dharma beginning with the fifth five hundred years and it shall not be cut off into the future until Lord Ajita (i.e., the future Buddha Maitreya comes forth in the world. (STN, v. 3, 2477 (fragment 2))

    Author Graham Lamont from the Kempon Hokke archives

    ReplyDelete
  30. Thank you, I am glad you enjoy reading the Kempon Hokke blog

    ReplyDelete
  31. One of the single best arguments for the unrivalled position of the Lotus Sutra. Much merit to you. Please copy and paste your essay on all Buddhist forums (or a summary of it) as it will help you keep the Vow we made on Vulture's Peak before the Only True Lord Buddha and the obligation we keep for his ardent prophet Nichiren. Namu Myoho Renge Kyo -- the LOTUS SUTRA is the ONLY path to salvation and ALL OTHER TEXTS -- especially Hinayana lead to the Avici Hells.

    ReplyDelete