HOW TO LABEL THE DISAPPOINTMENT

From the Italian website No Alla Soka Gakkai 

HOW TO LABEL THE DISAPPOINTMENT 

In all religious communities always develops a model for label 
information and to manage them in order to channel them and make them 
acceptable. On the surface simplicity of $ oka is that: 

Information management is a question of quantity and quality. These 
two aspects imply an analysis of how many similarities you are dealing 
with cognitive dissonance, and in what form and what. In the 
“external” society there are special labeling requirements, and so 
strident dissonances are recoded at some point so spontaneously from 
the “social brain”, the cult there can sometimes be potentially 
explosive contradictions, however, be classified into a single global 
schema of thought, even at the price of rielaborazzioni boldly 
convoluted. In fact, it is essential to guarantee $ oka still has all 
the costs and the squaring of the circle. Translating the above into 
practice, it is clear to insiders that, given the weight given by the 
desires of all’esaudimento Gohonzon (the object of worship), to 
neutralize and redefine all situations in which desires were not 
realized. It is a nonsense to say that 99% of the $ okista philosophy 
is everything in this stronghold. The militant proselytizing it 
focuses exclusively on this concept and its labeling. The adepts and 
hagiography argue that the Gohonzon elegantly fulfills all (ie 100%) 
the wishes of the faithful. If ever you will attend a meeting $ oka, 
after the demonstration phase of the acting and all its sophistry, you 
will notice a phase of confrontation between the followers all geared 
to the resonance of the mutual benefits of the practice. Commit a 
positive and phases of elation following various interventions are the 
norm. Then if someone complains instead of not being able to acquire 
what you want, then snap the labeling. 

Labelling of disappointment, or because my desires are not fulfilled: 

1) The desire was badly formulated: it was not clear, was ambiguous, 
too big, too small, unreachable … etc.etc., 

2) you have practiced evil, or little, or too little, 

3) for long-time followers: are severely attacked by the demon, 

4) for all: they represent the last exit before the bad karma of good 
karma created by the practice manifests itself, 

5) for more: the protection of the Gohonzon appear to the adept, who 
does not know that, now if he was satisfied his desire, that would in 
some way harmful to him, 

6) for beginners: the practitioner “not ready” to support the 
fulfillment of desire, 

7) for all and for that particular desire: the practitioner was not 
deeply determined, did not wish to sincerely 

 for many: the practitioner has not acted properly, that has not 
completed all the necessary actions to get to the meeting. 

The “dogma” to achieve their objectives reads: “establish-pray- 
act” (see the ceremony at the end of calendar year in which you write 
a little book wishes to achieve in the coming year). 

In conclusion then , if the goal was not achieved, then there must be 
a defect in one of three dogmas and go back to points 1, 2, 7 and 8, 
then if you have absolute certainty (and who really knows ?) that the 
State has well-established, prayed and done, you can always raise 
questions karmic (point 4), demonic (point 3) or 
“protection” (paragraphs 5 and 6). 

Hence the great bluffs which followers rarely resist (echoes usually 
does is short-lived). Points 1, 2, 7 and 8 are easily accepted and 
understood their logic and then leave them aside. The remaining 
points, or as it is entitled, the remaining labels being absolutely 
unprovable, are generally accepted as true without question. The 
“trinity” of dogma, ultimately, well-stocked, and if there are 
particular problems, neuroses, crises, etc.. It really works to 
increase the sense of self-efficacy, collective resonance of self- 
esteem; increasing expectations of success and personal resources, in 
this sense the practice “works”, no doubt, even if its benefits do not 
actually go beyond the normal statistics possibility of any other 
citizen of the world with a good sense of self-esteem. In other words, 
all the hubbub of activity, recitations, meetings, proselytizing 
(sorry, shakubuku) is a little high for a cost that gives the result. 
Especially since there are also … possible contraindications. 

Most of all what has been written is taken from the application of 
principles of multilevel marketing. 

Tenji-ma 

Original Text:Il proselitismo militante fa perno infatti solo ed 
esclusivamente su questo concetto e sulla sua etichettatura. 
Show alternative translations 
——————————————————————————– 
Taken from: John AR Blacking (1928 – 1990), Michael S. Gazzaniga 
(1939) et al.