Friday, March 23, 2018

Like Hillary Clinton, SGI leaders keep smiling despite being caught in countless lies


28 comments:

  1. Most of the oligarchs and sgi is pronuclear. Sgi pronuclear,when all nuclear reactors are associated with nuclear bombs. How wtarnge for a peace organisation. They are also grotesque radiation and neutron ovens that openly spray death and kill every thing. And the nucleoapes have a lot less control over their safety than you ever want to imagine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/03/23/the-ghost-of-hillary/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great article. Did you read any of the dozens of articles on the deaths of the more than 100 close associates of Hillary?

      Delete
    2. Creepy woman, just needs to get out of politics. Neocons are horrible people. They seem to always have a stranglehold now, no matter who is elected. Very discouraging.

      Delete
    3. Correct. There is little difference between Clinton and the Neocons.

      Delete
  3. Is that Bob Hasegawa with Linda Johnson?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. Yes, He's a Chicago Boy....he displayed natural leadership....smart - I think a lawyer...he moved, don't know where. I wonder if he is still practicing.......I'm curious enough to find out...will let you know if I do

      Delete
    2. He's in California. He goes to Burning Man every year.

      Delete
  5. Should we reconsider Yucca mountain?

    ReplyDelete
  6. No it is on a bad fault, that will probably go off when the big one hits cali. Each state that generates, should have the crap casked by now. No more fuel storage pools anywhere. They each should reposit their own hi level wastes, with incentives to close all reactors. Too dangerous to transport. So much bs in the nucleoape world. Trump just wants to build more reactors. That is what yucca is about. Last week they found that bird populations in France are crashing. It is not from pesticidew as their.lies imply, it is reactors. France just dumps raw plutonium into the english channel. They were set to close half their reactors by 2025. Since they got approved for a huge unstable water repository in west france , the backed out of closing reactors. They have quite a few that are ready to blow. Mangano and others have great epidemiology studies showing bird extinction around chernobyl and fukushima. Medical texts do not even explore radionuclide induced kidney damage, which is hundreds of times worse than the rest. The dumn nucleoapes instead, publish studies using radionuclides to contrast kidney damage from drugs or organic compounds. The worst propaganda, brainwashing and lapses of ethics possible. Too bad for the rest of us dumn bunnies. So they can have more bombs and illgotten gains from them. Its like the ultimate horror version of catch 22

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If i remember correctly, Yucca is 1100 feet underground. Shouldn't that protect groundwater and release even if the big one hits?

      Delete
  7. Mousseau not mangano sorry

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yucca. I have been there. In all actuality there is a lot of water in the state of nevada that is radioactively contaminated. Even from lake mead. Halliburtin , cheneys old company fracked 10s of thousands of tons of radioactive waste into the ground in nw and east nevada. Then there are all the above ground and under ground nuke tests. Then there are all the purposely melted won reactor at jack ass flats.

    Yucca has one of the few clean aquifers and water does run through the site. It is also geologically unstable

    https://m.lasvegassun.com/news/2017/mar/23/battle-against-yucca-mountain-nuclear-waste-dump-i/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You mentioned thst there was 70 thousand tons of radioactive waste in the US. So where did Haliburtons 10s of thousands of tons of radioactive waste come from?

      Delete
    2. That was in the 60s and 70s. There are millions of tons of nuclear waste in murica if u count uranium tailings, old reactor waste from the 50s60s70s, and high level bomb making waste from the 40s50s60s70s. There is radioactive medical waste, there is thorium and americium industrial waste. There is a uranium tailings pile in utah with 16 million tons on intermediate waste alone. There is waste from where bombs were detonated. There is a constant outflow of used fuel rods which is the worst! The stuff fracked into the ground in nevada was from bomb making waste and failed reactors. Waste from places like hanford in washington state and los alamos. Plutonium, rcesiums strontium, cobalt 60, americium californium yad yada yada etc. The govt also built many nuclear reactors , like the one north of los angeles that meted down a few times from 1957 to 1968. It was A small modular sodium reactor like the ones crazyman billgates and thorium freaks want to build. The government also built and purposely melted down reactors in idaho and at jackass flats,in the 50s to see what would happen and use people as guinea pigs. At hanford too. There were 10 thousand tons of higher level congo uranium tailings from the manhatten project , dumped in the west lake st louis trash dump, that is now on fire and irradiating the hell our of st louis. There is the waste where u are at in okeeville. By boulder colorado. From centrifuges in ohio, carolina, kentucky. So much shit in the tennessee valley authority sites in the southeast it is unbelievable. So much unmitigated bullshit lying the nucleoapes try to sell that nuclear waste would fit under ronald reagns desk or in a football field , that they should be hung out to dry

      Delete
    3. The next nuclear calamity, here will be at san louis obisbo , or in mexico from earthquakes.

      Delete
  9. Nuclear waste generates its own heat, even old waste. It causes generates hydrogen gas in its casks. It can catalyze chemical reactions in its surroundings,as busby pointed out. Not so many safe ways lr places to store ithttp://ag.nv.gov/Hot_Topics/Issue/Yucca/

    GEOLOGY and LOCATION: There are many unresolved scientific issues relative to the suitability of the Yucca Mountain site. These issues include hydrology, inadequacy of the proposed waste package, repository design and volcanism. The Yucca site is seismically and volcanically active, porous and incapable of geologically containing the waste. Yucca's aquifer drains to the Amargosa Valley, one of Nevada's most productive agricultural regions, is adjacent to a busy and growing Nellis Air Force Base, and is only 90 miles from our largest metropolitan area, Las Vegas.

    LIMITED SPACE: Yucca isn't big enough to store all of the nation's nuclear waste. More than 70,000 metric tons of high level nuclear waste and spent nuclear is stored in more than 77 reactor sites across the country. That number increases by more than 2,000 tons each year. Yucca's statutory design capacity is only 77,000 metric tons. By the time Yucca would be filled to capacity in 2036, there will still be at least the same amount of spent fuel still stored at the reaction sites, even if no new plants are built.

    TRANSPORTATION: Transporting waste to Yucca Mountain puts the American public at risk. More than 123 million people live near the proposed truck and train routes which would be used to deliver waste to Yucca Mountain. Those routes travel through 703 counties in 44 states. An accident or attack along those routes could hurt or kill thousands of innocent people.

    NATIONAL SECURITY: Contrary to DOE arguments, building the Yucca Mountain repository will not make America safer. Instead, it will give terrorists more attractive and vulnerable targets. The DOE expects more than 100,000 shipments of spent fuel to be transported to Yucca Mountain-thus creating 100,000 mobile targets. Furthermore, the DOE plans to store high-level nuclear waste and spent nuclear fuel above ground at the Yucca site for at least 100 years. This creates the largest new spent fuel storage target in the world.

    The Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects
    Yucca Mountain-Nevada's Perspective

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The hydrogen fluoride gas is particularly noxious.

      Delete
    2. Fracked 10s of thousand tons of nuclear waste? But you said there were 70 thousand tons in the entire US. From where was this waste?

      Delete
    3. That was in the 60s and 70s. There are millions of tons of nuclear waste in murica if u count uranium tailings, old reactor waste from the 50s60s70s, and high level bomb making waste from the 40s50s60s70s. There is radioactive medical waste, there is thorium and americium industrial waste. There is a uranium tailings pile in utah with 16 million tons on intermediate waste alone. There is waste from where bombs were detonated. There is a constant outflow of used fuel rods which is the worst! The stuff fracked into the ground in nevada was from bomb making waste and failed reactors. Waste from places like hanford in washington state and los alamos. Plutonium, rcesiums strontium, cobalt 60, americium californium yad yada yada etc. The govt also built many nuclear reactors , like the one north of los angeles that meted down a few times from 1957 to 1968. It was A small modular sodium reactor like the ones crazyman billgates and thorium freaks want to build. The government also built and purposely melted down reactors in idaho and at jackass flats,in the 50s to see what would happen and use people as guinea pigs. At hanford too. There were 10 thousand tons of higher level congo uranium tailings from the manhatten project , dumped in the west lake st louis trash dump, that is now on fire and irradiating the hell our of st louis. There is the waste where u are at in okeeville. By boulder colorado. From centrifuges in ohio, carolina, kentucky. So much shit in the tennessee valley authority sites in the southeast it is unbelievable. So much unmitigated bullshit lying the nucleoapes try to sell that nuclear waste would fit under ronald reagns desk or in a football field , that they should be hung out to dry

      Delete
  10. If they truly made a coordinated effert to clear the fuel pools in this country and used some limited storage there it might work. I do not know. There is little time left though. Coastal reactors, and fault reactors needed to be shut down 7 years ago. Heckuva predicament we are in.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Too bad about Yucca. What about stainless steel casks to deepest areas of the ocean, trench areas?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I dunno. I think maybe the should put some in yucca to be honest. Its scarin me. It will still corrode, because the crud generates its own heat. There is more nuclear waste in the ocean than you ori wanna know. Something real bad, is going to happen very soon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel the same way. I will chant for more clarity and maybe we can pinpoint the next real calamity and where. I have some ideas

      Delete
  13. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What they care about is zaimu (donations).

      Delete
    2. I toured hanford once. Had a friend who worked there. Their vitrification plan has failed miserably. There is an old fuku style ge reactor with elevated fuel pools by there. There are 1000s of thousands of tons of high level nuclear wwste there from retired naval vessel nuclear reactors and bomb making. I just have to laugh when womeone pwoplw talk about nuclear waste in mureica. The crime of hanford , is how much of it goes
      Into the supposedly pristine columbia river. They have tanks exploding from cesium and pultonium decay heat in old corroded tanks where water has evaporated. They have tunnels where who knows what is buried.

      Delete