In all religious communities always develops a model for label information and to manage them in order to channel them and make them acceptable. On the surface simplicity of $oka is that:
Information management is a question of quantity and quality. These two aspects imply an analysis of how many similarities you are dealing with cognitive dissonance, and in what form and what. In the “external” society there are special labeling requirements, and so strident dissonances are recoded at some point so spontaneously from the “social brain”, the cult there can sometimes be potentially explosive contradictions, however, be classified into a single global schema of thought, even at the price of rielaborazzioni boldly convoluted. In fact, it is essential to guarantee $ oka still has all the costs and the squaring of the circle. Translating the above into practice, it is clear to insiders that, given the weight given by the desires of all’esaudimento Gohonzon (the object of worship), to neutralize and redefine all situations in which desires were not realized. It is a nonsense to say that 99% of the $okista philosophy is everything in this stronghold. The militant proselytizing it focuses exclusively on this concept and its labeling. The adepts and hagiography argue that the Gohonzon elegantly fulfills all (ie 100%) the wishes of the faithful. If ever you will attend a meeting $oka, after the demonstration phase of the acting and all its sophistry, you will notice a phase of confrontation between the followers all geared to the resonance of the mutual benefits of the practice. Commit a positive and phases of elation following various interventions are the norm. Then if someone complains instead of not being able to acquire what you want, then snap the labeling.
Labelling of disappointment, or because my desires are not fulfilled:
1) The desire was badly formulated: it was not clear, was ambiguous, too big, too small, unreachable … etc.etc.,
2) you have practiced evil, or little, or too little,
3) for long-time followers: are severely attacked by the demon,
4) for all: they represent the last exit before the bad karma of good karma created by the practice manifests itself,
5) for more: the protection of the Gohonzon appear to the adept, who does not know that, now if he was satisfied his desire, that would in some way harmful to him,
6) for beginners: the practitioner “not ready” to support the fulfillment of desire,
7) for all and for that particular desire: the practitioner was not deeply determined, did not wish to sincerely
for many: the practitioner has not acted properly, that has not completed all the necessary actions to get to the meeting.
The “dogma” to achieve their objectives reads: “establish-pray- act” (see the ceremony at the end of calendar year in which you write a little book wishes to achieve in the coming year).
In conclusion then , if the goal was not achieved, then there must be a defect in one of three dogmas and go back to points 1, 2, 7 and 8, then if you have absolute certainty (and who really knows ?) that the State has well-established, prayed and done, you can always raise questions karmic (point 4), demonic (point 3) or “protection” (paragraphs 5 and 6).
Hence the great bluffs which followers rarely resist (echoes usually does is short-lived). Points 1, 2, 7 and 8 are easily accepted and understood their logic and then leave them aside. The remaining points, or as it is entitled, the remaining labels being absolutely unprovable, are generally accepted as true without question. The “trinity” of dogma, ultimately, well-stocked, and if there are particular problems, neuroses, crises, etc.. It really works to increase the sense of self-efficacy, collective resonance of self- esteem; increasing expectations of success and personal resources, in this sense the practice “works”, no doubt, even if its benefits do not actually go beyond the normal statistics possibility of any other citizen of the world with a good sense of self-esteem. In other words, all the hubbub of activity, recitations, meetings, proselytizing (sorry, shakubuku) is a little high for a cost that gives the result. Especially since there are also … possible contraindications.
Most of all what has been written is taken from the application of principles of multilevel marketing.
No comments:
Post a Comment