Total Pageviews

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

Shoju or shakubuku?

Based on Daisaku Ikeda's opinion, an SGI member writes: "It appears to me you are now saying that Allan was fundamentally correct. The point is that non-Buddhist teachings like Christianity do not have much power. They certainly cannot lead to permanent happiness, but they pose no threat to Buddhist teachings. I believe it is the Daishonin's teaching to be magnanimous and through friendship let non-Buddhists discover the greatness of True Mahayana Buddhism. In other words, employ the practice of Shoju." - Tom U 

Based on the The Lotus Sutra, “Good men, [the Thus Come One observes how among living beings there are] those who delight in lesser teachings, meager in virtue and heavy with defilement.”, and Nichiren's opinion, employ the practice of shakubuku.


17 comments:

  1. Shakubuku has no basis in Buddhism whatsoever. Your leap in literacy abour how the Buddha makes practitioners sick is sick and absurd.

    ReplyDelete
  2. “Good men, [the Thus Come One observes how among living beings there are] those who delight in lesser teachings, meager in virtue and heavy with defilement.”

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Your leap in literacy abour how the Buddha makes practitioners sick is sick and absurd." -- warped shakubuku

    ReplyDelete
  4. Buddha did not cause his sick children to grieve in order to awaken them in Chapter 16? The problem is not shakubuku [the forceful practices], it is a less than deft application of shakubuku.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There are no Hinayana or Mahayana teachings, only Hinayana and Mahayana practitioners.

    [All] The Dharma is flawless and inconceivable,
    Leading all to engage in spiritual practice:
    After he [Sariputra] completely eliminated afflictions and
    Achieved the flawless and inconceivable Dharma
    He comprehended the Buddha's intent to
    Enable sentient beings to
    Uncover the Buddha's understanding and views
    And attain perfect awakening at the
    Place of enlightenment.

    The Buddha gave teachings
    According to capabilities and circumstances
    He gave provisional teachings that
    Contained wondrous principles
    But he only used the great vehicle Dharma,
    Which is flawless and inconceivable, to lead people
    He enabled sentient beings to
    Uncover the Buddha's knowledge and views and
    Attain perfect awakening at the
    Place of enlightenment

    ReplyDelete
  6. There are monks and nuns
    who behave with overbearing arrogance,
    laymen full of self-esteem,
    laywomen who are lacking in faith.
    Among the four kinds of believers, the likes of these
    number five thousand.
    They fail to see their own errors,
    are heedless and remiss with regard to the precepts,
    clinging to their shortcomings, unwilling to change.
    But these persons of small wisdom have already left;
    the chaff among this assembly
    has departed in the face of the Buddha’s authority.
    These persons were of paltry merit and virtue,
    incapable of receiving this Law.
    This assembly is now free of branches and leaves,
    made up only of those steadfast and truthful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And yet the 5000 while guilty of arrogance and laziness were not guilty of slander. The didn't try to distort the one-vehicle with nonsense like forceful-practices or change the text to assert their "authority."

      Delete
  7. You should reread Chapter 3 of the Lotus Sutra and get back to us.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fourteen slanders according to the Lotus Sutra

    "To those who are haughty (1) and lazy (2)
    And to those with self-centered views (3),
    Do not preach this Sutra.
    Common shallow people (4),
    Deeply attached to the five desires (5),
    Who on hearing cannot apprehend (6),
    Do not preach it to them.
    If any people do not believe in (7)
    And vilify this Sutra (10)
    Then they cut [themselves] off [from] all
    The Buddha-seeds in the worlds;
    Or if again they sullenly frown (8),
    And cherish doubts and perplexities (9),
    Listen to my declaration
    Concerning the recompense of such people's sins:
    Whether during the buddha's lifetime
    Or after his extinction,
    If there be any who slander
    Such a Sutra as this,
    Who, seeing those who read and recite,
    Write or hold this Sutra,
    Scorn and despise (11), hate (12) and envy (13) them
    And bear them a tenacious grudge (14).
    Concerning the recompense of such people's sin,
    Listen now again:
    After their lifetimes end
    They will enter into the Avici hell...." (Lotus Sutra Chapter 3, The Parable of
    the Burning House)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Burning House is about attachment to lesser vehicles which has nothing to with avici hell or slander. From your playbook, "Try again" MR.

      Delete
  9. You mean 14 slanders according to Nichiren and you should understand 3.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "After their lifetimes end
    They will enter into the Avici hell." -- LS Chapter 3

    ReplyDelete
  11. "The Burning House has nothing to do with slander" -- ohgee

    http://www.nichirenlibrary.org/en/lsoc/search?languageNavi=English&bookTypeNavi=LSOC&resultFlgNavi=1&searchOptionsNavi=Texts-Contents&searchOptionsNavi=Texts-Background&searchOptionsNavi=Texts-Notes&searchInputNavi=slander&searchSubmit=Navi&findtext=&languageNavSp=English&bookTypeNavSp=LSOC&resultFlgNavSp=1&searchInputNavSp=&findtext=

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Upholding" is not distorting it's intent, let alone influencing others under a guise of Buddhism.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Does not follow from the discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Read your own links from LS and discover That slander consists of (slighting those who uphold, copy, ...) Rather than someone who disagrees with you or practices something else. Nichiren is the one who slighted bodhisattvas at Lotus Dharma Assembly. It was Nichiren who "restricted" practitioners from 6 paramitas. No wonder Nichiren followers rarely mention the word, "Bodhisattva. "
    The Buddha was relieved the 5000 left because they had potential to slander by not understanding and then transmitting their misunderstood views to others.

    Further more, it is Vulture Peak, not Eagle Peak. At least get your blog title right.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You can't reject and slander Nichiren and uphold the Lotus Sutra. You are the slanderer and are destined to the Avici Hell.

    ReplyDelete