>As if this newsgroup were a popularity contest? I don't think people
>are that stupid. This NG doesn't reflect reality. People that are dumb
>enough to make this NG the basis of their choice of organisations can
>stay away from the SGI, please. Neither I nor Soren officially
>represent the SGI or it's millions of members. We represent our own
>points of view. To think that the point of view of 10 million SGI
>members are ALL THE SAME is pretty stupid. Person to person dialogue
>doesn't exist on this NG. No matter how much we say, none of us will
>know each other any better than before. -- SGI member
>are that stupid. This NG doesn't reflect reality. People that are dumb
>enough to make this NG the basis of their choice of organisations can
>stay away from the SGI, please. Neither I nor Soren officially
>represent the SGI or it's millions of members. We represent our own
>points of view. To think that the point of view of 10 million SGI
>members are ALL THE SAME is pretty stupid. Person to person dialogue
>doesn't exist on this NG. No matter how much we say, none of us will
>know each other any better than before. -- SGI member
You represent your own points of view? What happened to the points of view of the Lotus Sutra and Nichiren Daishonin? Since you represent your own points of view, rather than those of the Buddha (Lotus Sutra) and Nichiren Daishonin (Gosho), what wretched disciples you are. If all SGI members have different points of view, you are in disunity rather than unity. This is not accurate. Your members all have Daisaku Ikeda's points of view, not those of the Buddha and Nichiren Daishonin. Your unity is based on the mind of a common mortal rather than the mind of the Buddha. Your foundation is built on shifting sands. This is clear from your shifting doctrines.
No comments:
Post a Comment